From www.astrology-and-science.com         Click here to return to home page

The Gauquelin work 3
Response to Ertel et al

Geoffrey Dean

The uncensored version of my letter in Correlation 23(2), 53-57, 2006.

Abstract -- Article consists of Geoffrey Dean's January 2006 letter to Correlation replying to articles by Ertel, Kollerstom, Douglas and others on Gauquelin matters in 23(1). It restores the 60% (including crucial paragraphs) censored by the Correlation editor in 23(2) and displays them in a different colour. It describes how a Dutch publisher started a definitive Eretel-Dean exchange free of avoidable mistakes, and how Ertel's withdrawal in favour of Correlation led to precisely the disregard for readers that the Dutch publisher had wished to avoid. It surveys the issues Ertel raises in his total of 80+ Correlation pages. Most of the issues have been raised and answered before, so it contains little (other than issues of defamation, censorship, and malice) not already on this website. In a reply to Dean's letter, Ertel ignores crucial results such as Dean's heredity findings (half his total findings!), his cluster analyses, and the astonishingly close match to every one of the many Gauquelin puzzles.